Development Pipeline

This pipeline defines how sites progress from initial screening to execution readiness through a series of feasibility gates. Each stage exists to surface risk early and prevent premature capital commitment.

Progression is earned, not assumed.

Screening

Stage 01

Purpose

Eliminate infeasible sites at first contact.

Zoning compliance, permitted uses, bulk controls, and parking are evaluated as hard feasibility gates to determine whether a site is structurally viable at all. No volumetric or financial assumptions are introduced at this stage.

Primary focus
  • Zoning and use permissions

  • Bulk controls and contextual limits

  • Parking as a gating constraint

Massing

Stage 02

Purpose

Test whether zoning yield translates into physical reality.

The permissible envelope is translated into a realistic building form to confirm that theoretical FAR can become usable volume. Misalignment between zoning yield and physical constraints is treated as a feasibility risk.

Primary focus
  • Envelope translation

  • Setbacks, height, lot coverage

  • Adjacencies and physical constraints

Underwriting

Stage 03

Purpose

Test viability within reasonable economic ranges.

Only after structural feasibility is established does the pipeline evaluate economics. Analysis prioritizes ranges, sensitivities, and downside exposure rather than precision modeling.

Primary focus
  • Order-of-magnitude costs

  • Yield sensitivity

  • Downside scenarios

Due Diligence

Stage 04

Purpose

Surface hidden risks not visible earlier.

Diligence is used to invalidate assumptions where necessary by identifying title, survey, environmental, or regulatory issues that could materially affect feasibility.

Primary focus
  • Title and survey

  • Environmental conditions

  • Regulatory edge cases

Entitlement

Stage 05

Purpose

Evaluate whether optionality or certainty can be created.

Discretionary paths are assessed for their ability to reshape risk, pricing, or buildable outcomes. Entitlement is treated as a lever, not an assumption.

Discretionary paths are assessed for their ability to reshape risk, pricing, or buildable outcomes. Entitlement is treated as a lever,
not an assumption.

Primary focus
  • As-of-right vs discretionary paths

  • Entitlement risk

  • Optionality creation

Execution Readiness

Stage 06

Commit capital once uncertainty is bounded.

Execution proceeds only after uncertainty has been materially reduced across prior stages. Capital is committed intentionally, with known and accepted residual risk.

Closing Principle

Early clarity preserves capital.

The pipeline prioritizes early constraint over late optimization. Most value is preserved by stopping before complexity compounds.